The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT has actually been a fascinating GPU this generation. It’s both more affordable than the completing Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090— and in some cases quicker, too. It’s now been revitalized with the RX 6950 XT, a late entrant into the turbulent GPU market. Nvidia has actually likewise done its part with the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, which brings excellent efficiency, albeit with a high expense and power draw at 450 W TDP.
With the initial RTX 3090 rate just recently reducing somewhat, it produces an intriguing contrast versus the more recent AMD RX 6950 XT. The RTX 3090 Ti uses more efficiency, however is considerably beyond the rate bracket of the RX 6950 XT. Is this AMD revitalize enough to press efficiency for AMD ahead of Nvidia, even in the dirty waters of ray tracing? Does it move the needle for high-end players enough for them to change their loyalty from Nvidia to AMD? Let’s learn!
Nvidia RTX 3090 vs. AMD 6950 XT: Price
Relax. You can quickly discover both GPUs in stock now at the majority of sellers, and usually at near to MSRP. The GPU market has actually experienced a considerable recession throughout the last numerous months, with costs rapidly dropping from their dizzying levels.
The AMD RX 6950 XT is available in at a $1,099 MSRP for the recommendation design, and some third-party designs vary from $1,199 to $1,299 A modest bump from the $9996900 XT rates– however it does not indicate they’re a good deal. With the decreasing GPU market and whisperings of the next-generation GPUs coming out this year, it has actually substantially moistened need and interest for this level of GPU.
The Nvidia RTX 3090 has actually likewise experienced much lower need, leading to rapidly falling prices. While you’re still not likely to discover a $1,499 Founders Edition at MSRP, the majority of designs such as those from the EVGA RTX 3090 lineup have actually experienced a substantial cost drop, can be found in as low as $1,609 for the Black series. (The 3090 Ti debuted at $1,999, a huge boost over the RTX 3090– and it’s currently being marked down at lots of merchants, too)
The prices on the utilized market is even lower, nevertheless, with RTX 3090 s dipping near the $1,200 mark in a lot of cases.
Neither design is a terrific price-to-performance option this late into the release cycle. Many high-end players who do not have a top-tier GPU will likely be finest served by awaiting the next generation this year.
Nvidia RTX 3090 vs. AMD 6950 XT: Performance
AMD definitely included an unexpected efficiency with the initial 6900 XT– it had the ability to match or beat the RTX 3090 in specific video games and circumstances. Has the RX 6950 XT lastly crossed the Rubicon in all efficiency locations? Not rather. When it pertains to ray tracing efficiency, the RTX 3090 is still out ahead. (Check out Brad Chacos’ evaluation for a much deeper dive on the brand-new AMD revitalizes.)
In video games such as Watch Dogs Legion with standard rasterization, we can see the AMD RX 6950 XT carrying out too or much better than the RTX 3090 (specifically at lower resolutions). This pattern continues in other video games such as Horizon Zero Dawn, where it’s able to stay up to date with the RTX3090 Video game after video game, both GPUs trade blows and are extremely competitive with each other.
Both GPUs have celebration techniques up their sleeves for efficiency, too. AMD has Smart Access Memory that can improve efficiency when combined with a Ryzen CPU, in addition to Radeon Super Resolution This will provide it substantial increases in numerous video games, besting the RTX 3090 sometimes, as revealed listed below in Horizon Zero Dawn Nvidia likewise has DLSS innovation that does marvels for keeping visual fidelity and high frames all at once– which is a player changer when coupled with ray tracing.
What takes place when we present ray tracing? That’s where Nvidia’s RTX 3090 still holds a benefit over AMD. The 6950 XT does not have actually updated ray tracing hardware when compared to the 6900 XT, keeping it behind the Nvidia RTX GPUs in this case.
It can be argued that there are decreasing returns for ray tracing visuals and efficiency, with differing outcomes. The innovation puts crazy stress on efficiency, decreasing frame rates substantially up until you claw some back with the aid of an upscaling innovation like DLSS or AMD’s FSR. The visual effect does not constantly make losing that efficiency rewarding, either. When it comes to the “halo” GPUs like these, ray tracing can be part of the factor you get a high-end GPU in the very first location; you desire to turn all the eye sweet up to Ultra, consisting of ray tracing. Paired with Nvidia’s DLSS, the efficiency charge can be alleviated, and the visuals took pleasure in totally.
This is one huge benefit of the RTX 3090 versus the more recent 6950 XT– optimal efficiency and visuals matter when you’re investing method over $1,000 for a GPU. AMD’s ray tracing hardware is a generation behind Nvidia’s application, while its DLSS competitor, FSR 2.0, is fantastic however still in its infancy, with just a handful of video games supporting the recently established innovation at this moment. That indicates ray tracing is finest experienced at 1440 p resolution on the 6950 XT, while you can typically crank ray traced video games even at 4K on the3090 If you’re not thinking about ray tracing nevertheless, the 6950 XT is a mighty great option for considerably less expense.
Let’s not forget that the RTX 3090 is definitely much better tailored towards material development and other workstation usage cases. With a tremendous 24 GB of GDDR6x VRAM, it will easily beat the 16 GB RX 6950 XT in many content production jobs. The 3080 Ti would be a more sensible rival to the 6950 XT in this case as a pure video gaming option.
Nvidia RTX 3090 vs. AMD 6950 XT: Power and other things to understand
The RTX 3090 loads a TDP of 350 W, with numerous third-party designs eclipsing 400 W. The RX 6950 XT can be found in a 335 W TDP, which is sensible for the efficiency that it puts out. Keep in mind, the 3090 Ti is currently as much as 450 W TDP– so next-generation offerings will likely increase considerably in requirements.
You’ll desire a minimum of a 750 W power supply for both, however we ‘d suggest you up that even greater for future proofing– as top quality power materials tend to last a long period of time.
You’ll require a case with great air flow for both these choices, and much better clearance than lower GPUs need. (They’re typically covered in a great, thick, sturdy air coolers to keep their temperature levels in check.)
Which is the much better choice for water cooling? We ‘d argue that the RTX 3090 is, given that it likely will have a larger series of water obstructs offered on the marketplace. Plus, with its steaming-hot VRAM, it typically benefits more from taking a deep swim versus the normally cooler RX 6950 XT.
So, is the 6950 XT enough to finest the RTX 3090?
The 6950 XT is a somewhat more effective addition to the high-end AMD lineup, installing an excellent efficiency versus the RTX3090 It’s basic: If you’re dipping into greater resolutions and wish to utilize ray tracing, Nvidia still holds a benefit here. DLSS and the Nvidia encoders are likewise terrific innovations that serve individuals well.
If you’re after pure frame rate goodness– without as much ray tracing, the 6950 XT can be typically a far better option than the RTX 3090, specifically in sub-4K resolutions. AMD uses excellent innovations such as FSR, Smart Access Memory to truly up the efficiency too.
So, who wins? The 6950 XT comes in too late in the release cycle to be pertinent in the quickly decreasing GPU market, making it a pricey alternative. The aging RTX 3090 is a comparable story. Its high rate was never ever an excellent choice for simply video gaming– making much better usage for hybrid material creators/gamers rather. The RTX 3090 Ti is an even worse worth proposal this late into the story, making it just appropriate for a couple of high-end lovers who do not mind the price.
The decision: This is an excellent ole’ made grinding halt. We ‘d suffer the marketplace a couple of months as both will experience even steeper decreases in rate with the intro of the next generation. Otherwise, if you truly should have one now, the choice will boil down to ray tracing choice and resolution you’re dipping into. Both GPUs will provide you excellent, well-rounded efficiency for several years to come– however neither are a fantastic option today as the GPU market is quickly altering this year.
When you acquire through links in our posts, we might make a little commission. This does not impact our editorial self-reliance